AP Literature
Erickson
3/25/13
Erickson
3/25/13
Svidrigailov and Satan
Throughout the novel, Crime and Punishment by
Fyodor Dostoevsky, The character Svidrigailov epitomizes hedonism and
self-service; sometimes to the point of being equated to Satan. His
entire life is dedicated to the search of pleasure and cares not for its
source. He is willing to spend almost any amount of money on acquiring
these goals. Even though he sometimes acts charitably, he is quick to
compensate for his acts of good with some other acts of gratuitous
depravity. However, it can be said that when all has failed and when he
realizes that his life has had little meaning, he is willing to do what
he feels must be done. He takes his own life after coming to the
conclusion that his own nihilistic approach to life, coupled with his
shameless self-involvement, has done nothing to help his relationships
with other people around him. It is Dounia’s rejection of him that makes
him come to the realization that despite all of his acts of grandeur
and his self-serving attitude, he is unable to acquire the one thing
that he desires most of all; respect and admiration from a woman he has
become infatuated with. It is this moment of clarity that brings
Svidrigailov into the light.
Much of Svidrigailov’s actions are in the service of himself; that
being said, much of what Satan is tied to, is often predicated around
some sort of hedonism. Satan is one to tempt others with desire or some
other self-service. In order to get Eve to eat the apple, he told her it
would give her knowledge and power. It is by this creed of avarice that
Svidrigailov lived by, caring only for what he got out of his actions.
It is for this reason that Svidrigailov gave the money to the
Marmeladov’s family. He had hoped only for some sort of personal growth,
as a result of his knowing that his actions prior had done naught but
condemn him. But, he did not find his salvation in this, he had fallen
too far, and found only one type of recourse; that being suicide.
His
exposure to the truth, which is synonymous with light in many aspects,
can be related to a quote from the bible "Everyone who does evil hates
the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will
be exposed" (John 3.20). Throughout the novel, Svidrigailov has been
juxtaposed with darkness, especially just before his demise. The hotel
can be seen as his last refuge from the truth that has been following
him throughout the novel. He lives there in order to find some kind of
peace from the anguish he has been experiencing as a result of his
newfound cognizance. It isn’t until he leaves the hotel that he is able
to find absolution. He leaves the dark of his past, having realized the
true density of his actions and comes to the light where he faces
retribution for his avarice and the harm that he has caused others in
the name of self-service.
In
the bible Satan falls, is bound, then released, fight in the last
battle between good and evil, and then finally struck down, much like
Svidrigailov. Svidrigailov’s fall from heaven would be the mysterious
death of the young girl he was involved with. He is bound by his wife
like the cage in the bottomless pit. She does her best to keep him under
control. During this time he is relatively quiet except for one
incident where his wife was to blame for most of the pain. After the
mysterious death of his wife the final reign of the beast is upon the
world as he is now free from his cage. He travels to meet the main
characters and tempts them to acting to his will with gifts, like the
temptations of christ in the desert. In the final confrontation between
good and evil, the vile Svidrigailov confronts the pure and innocent
Dounia and is rejected by her. This stands for the final confrontation
that is spoke about in Revelations. After this final battle Svidrigailov
uses the last bit of humanity to see what he has done, right all that
he can and finally end it life. Svidrigailov casts himself into his own
lake of fire. At last the adversary of Israel is defeated and
Raskolnikov is able to turn himself in, the act of which had been called
returning to israel.
In
conclusion, Svidrigailov is evil incarnate in the flesh of man. Though
he carries with him a perennial aura of dread throughout the novel, he
also invites direct associations to darkness beyond the metaphysical. He
breathes a stertorous miasma of impulsive, sadistic hedonism that
weaves itself into multifarious forms of abuse, all corollary of his
insular nihilism. He is everything brutal and corrupt in the human
spirit raised to apotheosis: like Satan, he represents the nadir of
mortal potential and the morbid cesspool on the margins of the mind that
permeates one’s essence when empathy dilapidates and the self is
elevated.
Although I don't necessarily agree that Svidrigailov is on the level of Satan I do believe that this group made a very convincing comparison. Svid is definitely and evil man and I completely agree with the fact that he used temptation as his key tool in trying to obtain what he wanted. I also agree with the point that killing himself was his escape because he had nowhere else to turn. You guys say he uses his last bit oh humanity to commit this act but I don't know if I fully agree with that. I think that throughout the novel, although he is evil, Svid hasn't necessarily lost his humanity. Yes he temps people and yes he is a creepy stalker but to me he is only doing this (sadly) because he is in love. I feel as if his creepy obsession for a need to be loved is what causes his rater evil nature. Just as you said his life is dedicated to the search of pleasure and he doesn't care where he gets it. But, even my thoughts don't correspond exactly with your's I think you guys did a wonderful job.
ReplyDeleteI am not very familiar with the Bible, nor the story of Satan, I see the paralleling qualities that have been presented in this essay. After looking up the definition of hedonism, it is undeniable that Svidrigailov is a prime example. When Dounia went to work for Svid's family, he was initially very attracted to her, and went out of his way to have her, resulting in a very misunderstood circumstance on Dounia's part. It is only after Dounia is cast away by Svid's wife that she finds out that it was his own impulsive tendencies all along. Also, isn't it believed that Svid killed his wife to go and find Dounia? His constant relying on urges to gain pleasure no matter what the cost perfectly defines hedonism itself. I'm not sure if his intentions are identical to Satan, because Satan is that very far reaching idea of the highest evil to me. Svid has his human qualities that set him apart. Overall, his lack of restraint and discipline leads him down a very messy road, as far as relationships go. In our world, instincts are constantly redirected or suppressed to maintain ;ofe's equilibrium, but Svid has a very hard time doing that, which is his ultimate downfall.
ReplyDeleteI think that this is a very interesting comparison that you have created between Satan and Svid, although I do not exactly agree all the way. The key difference between Satan and Svid is that he realizes where the line is between right and wrong, and he never fully allows himself to cross over to that level of darkness after he meets the incredible Dounia. I think he recognizes his desires as unworthy and thus ends up killing himself. When Svid doesn't follow all of his own desires and motivations he proves himself to be different from Satan. Don't get me wrong, I'm NOT calling him an angel or a good man, but he was simply a man. A man unable to achieve what he desires, and thus chooses a path much different from the one he was on.
ReplyDeleteBut an excellent essay, you argue your points very well.
Like Jenna, I'm not at all familiar with Satan's background, but when presented with the parallels it's easy to see the correlation even without the explanations you gave. It can be said that the definition of evil was based off of Satan's character; however, I don't think it can be said that Svidrigailov is exactly as Satan because he does show a desire to be good (even if these desires have evil foundations). It is not said in your essay that Satan and Svidrigailov can be thought to be exact copies of one another, but I think that more opposites in their characters' should be presented.
ReplyDeleteI am also only vaguely familiar with the Bible. Although I really enjoyed the comparison presented in this essay. However I think that one aspect of Satan that is not necessarily to do "evil", but to do as one wishes without directly obeying the word of God -- perhaps this is also something that can be contributed to Svidraigilov's choices. It is interesting to argue whether or not Dostoevsky purposefully inserted the religious overtones within the novel and what exactly he meant to draw out of them, and this is definitely one of the
ReplyDeleteAs everyone else that has commented so far, I found the comparisons in this essay rather intriguing. According to my personal beliefs, when man is not following God, or living from the inborn desire for good in all of our hearts, they are following Satan. Satan is hard to fully understand; he is the embodiment of all things evil. He wants us to stray from all things virtuous, he strives to lead us into temptation, and ultimately thrives on the immediate fulfillment of shameful desires. Therefore, when Svid leads his life purely to fulfill a selfish appetite, I do see the direct comparison between him and Satan - that's exactly what Satan wants him to do. However, while Svid does seem to follow the path of Satan religiously, I absolutely do not believe that makes him Satan. Svid living for devilish desires makes him Satan no more than doing something righteous makes any one of us God. Yes, he chooses to fall into Satan's hands repeatedly and follow a path many would deem unholy, but he is still not Satan himself.
ReplyDelete